Ecosystems

Building ecosystem resilience starts with condition: Applying the Habitat Condition Assessment System (HCAS) to Australia

Region Oceania & Pacific


Summary

Healthy ecosystems underpin biodiversity persistence, climate resilience, and human wellbeing. Yet decision-makers often lack consistent, repeatable information on where habitats are intact, where they are degrading, and how those patterns are changing through time. In Australia—a continent-scale country with diverse ecosystems, frequent natural disturbances, and multiple governance jurisdictions—this challenge has historically limited national environmental reporting and coordinated action.

Figure 1: Collecting field data in the Australian rangelands (Attribution: Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN))

The Habitat Condition Assessment System (HCAS) addresses this gap by providing Australia with a national, satellite-based capability for monitoring ecosystem condition. Developed through a long-term partnership between Australia’s National science agency, CSIRO, and the Australian Government Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW), HCAS integrates Earth observation (EO) data, environmental variables, and field-based ecological knowledge to deliver consistent ecosystem condition information across the entire continent.

The most recent version of HCAS delivers a coherent time series from 1988 to 2025, mapped at 90-metre resolution, yielding a single, common metric across all terrestrial ecosystems. By accounting for rainfall, fire, and other natural variability, HCAS helps distinguish ecosystem dynamics from human-driven impacts.

Today, HCAS underpins national environmental reporting, supports climate risk and resilience assessments, and provides critical inputs to Australia’s emerging Nature Repair Market. HCAS has progressed from an experimental research tool to an operational national monitoring system, informing decisions on conservation, restoration, and climate adaptation at scale.

Value Chain Diagram

  1. Decide

    • Understand the extent, distribution and change in ecosystem condition at national, regional and local scales
    • Support strategic decision making for biodiversity conservation and restoration planning across jurisdictions
    • Provide evidence for climate adaptation and resilience assessments
    • Supply consistent inputs to downstream tools and indicators (e.g. connectivity, ecosystem accounts)
  2. Apply

    • Annual reporting of national regional trends in ecosystem condition and connectivity
    • Input to the National Climate Risk Assessment (natural environments)
    • Supporting metrics for Australia’s Nature Repair Market, via the National Biodiversity Assessment System
    • Inputs to State of the Environment reporting and ecosystem accounting
    • Used by researchers and analysts to assess biodiversity persistence and spatial priorities
    Service Evolution
  3. Data production

    • National ecosystem condition maps
    • Annual time-series maps (3-year rolling averages) and long-term averages
    • National uncertainty maps (95% confidence intervals)
    • Time-series trend maps
    • National Connectivity Index (NCI) derived from HCAS
    • Software, managed workflows, reports, factsheets, and scientific publications
    Ground Segment Evolution
  4. Sense

    • Long-term Landsat satellite archive for ecosystem characteristics (MODIS products used in earlier versions)
    • Mapped abiotic environmental variables
    • Field locations of high ecosystem integrity (unmodified apart from natural change) for training the condition estimation model
    Space Segment Evolution

Decision-Making Context and Needs

Australia’s ecosystems support globally significant biodiversity, but they are subject to widespread pressures from land use change, altered fire regimes, invasive species, and climate extremes. Governments and land managers need to prioritise resources and evaluate conservation and restoration outcomes.

Some jurisdictions have developed ecosystem condition products, but differing methods and uneven coverage limit national comparability, especially for biodiversity and matters of national environmental significance that cross boundaries.

Before HCAS, there was no cost-effective, repeatable national method that could assess ecosystem condition while also accounting for Australia’s strong natural variability. This gap significantly constrained the capacity of land managers and policy makers to respond flexibly to environmental change and strategically deploy policy, regulations and funding.

HCAS was developed to meet this need. From early on, DCCEEW partnered closely in its design, ensuring that the system evolved in response to real policy and reporting requirements. HCAS has since become an annually updated operational system embedded in national decision processes.

Earth Observation Data Products and Information

HCAS expresses ecosystem condition as a score between 0.0 (removed or highly modified habitat) and 1.0 (high-integrity habitat that supports native species and ecological processes). HCAS integrates multiple ecosystem characteristics.

Three types of spatial data are combined:

  • Remotely sensed ecosystem characteristics, describing vegetation structure, function and composition
  • Physical environmental variables, such as climate and soils, which define what is ecologically “expected” at a location
  • Reference sites, representing contemporary locations where ecosystems retain high integrity.

For each pixel, HCAS compares observed ecosystem characteristics with those expected under reference conditions. The closer the match, the higher the condition score.

Figure 2: The four main types of ecological application challenges for satellite remote sensing. (Attribution: Harwood et al. (2016); Williams et al. (2024))

For example, increased tree cover may indicate recovery in a wet forest but degradation in a semi-arid grassland. Additionally, ecosystems naturally fluctuate in response to rainfall, fire, and climate variability—changes that should not be confused with loss of integrity.

HCAS addresses these challenges using a multivariate statistical framework that:

  • Analyses all ecosystem characteristics together
  • Allows reference characteristics to vary with environmental gradients
  • Estimates condition as distance from locally appropriate reference sites.

The result is a more realistic assessment across heterogeneous landscapes.

Figure 3: Evolution of HCAS (Attribution: CSIRO, Landsat imagery courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey, processed via Google Earth Engine)

HCAS delivers:

  • Annual ecosystem condition maps using three-year rolling averages
  • A long-term average condition baseline
  • Trend maps showing directional change through time
  • Spatially explicit uncertainty estimates, improving transparency and confidence in use
  • The National Connectivity Index, combining condition and landscape configuration
  • A Product Guide describing the data collection, its limitations and uses

HCAS has evolved alongside EO capability, moving from coarser MODIS inputs (250 m) to higher-resolution Landsat-based variables (90 m), improving its ability to capture finer-scale patterns relevant to management. The method can be adapted to higher-resolution or regional applications where suitable data are available.

All project datasets and inputs are published to an open repository (https://doi.org/10.25919/zhfq-1x80).

Underlying Observations and Data Sources

HCAS uses analysis-ready Landsat Annual Geomedian and Fractional Cover percentile data from 1988–2025 from the Geoscience Australia archive, processed on CSIRO’s Earth Analytics Science Innovation (EASI) platform.

Climate and soil layers provide ecological context for assessing conditions against local expectations; provided as Open Source infrastructure through Australia’s Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN).

Figure 4: Ecosystem experts participating in facilitated workshops (Attribution: CSIRO)

Reference sites are identified through multiple lines of evidence, including field-based monitoring, protected area data, land-use and infrastructure layers and vegetation extent. Experts and local knowledge holders are an important source of information, contributing assessments via workshops and the online Habitat Condition Assessment Tool (HCAT) that anchors the model in real-world ecological understanding.

HCAS continues to evolve as new EO capabilities emerge. Planned EO enhancements include:

  • Fused Landsat–Sentinel-2 time series to improve temporal fidelity
  • Integration of Sentinel-1 SAR indices to better capture vertical vegetation structure
  • Tailored products to support specific decision contexts, such as restoration planning and climate adaptation

These developments will further strengthen the role of EO in guiding ecosystem-scale decisions under climate change.

Figure 5: Four of the fourteen HCAS EO variables: (A) aridity [BSI], productivity [kNDVI] and water [NDWI] gradients – shown as an RGB composite; (B) intra-annual variability in ecosystem characteristics [EDEV] (Attribution: CSIRO (image), Geoscience Australia Landsat Analysis Ready Data Collection 3 , Open Data Cube Products Using High-Dimensional Statistics of Time Series

Impacts and Benefits

HCAS demonstrates how long-term EO data can be translated into actionable environmental intelligence. Its beneficiaries include national and state governments, land managers, researchers, and emerging environmental markets.

Key impacts include:

  • National environmental reporting: HCAS underpins indicators in Australia’s annual reporting and informs the State of the Environment report.
  • Climate adaptation and risk assessment: HCAS contributes to assessments of ecosystem vulnerability and resilience within the National Climate Risk Assessment framework.
  • Nature Repair Market: HCAS currently inputs to two core biodiversity metrics used to calculate baselines and change, ensuring restoration actions are assessed in their broader landscape context.
  • Ecosystem accounting: HCAS supports measures of change in biodiversity persistence and threatened species habitat in Australia’s National Ecosystem Accounts.
  • Connectivity and capacity: By integrating with the National Connectivity Index, HCAS helps quantify how fragmentation and condition jointly affect ecosystem capacity.

Beyond formal reporting, HCAS has revolutionised how decision-makers see and talk about ecosystems, shifting the conversation from isolated sites to connected landscapes observed consistently through time.

Figure 6: Net change in habitat condition trends at the bioregional scale. (Attribution: DCCEEW Annual Report 2024–25)
Figure 7: Application of HCAS-informed indicators in Australia’s National Climate Risk Assessment: the Biodiversity Ecosystem Resilience Index (BERI) (Attributions: A- Liedloff et al. (2025), B National Climate Risk Assessment)